点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
宁夏泾源：“冰雪经济”让冷资源“热”起来******
中新网宁夏泾源1月10日电 (李佩珊 屈琳昆)1月10日，已是“三九”第二天，但宁夏固原市泾源县兴盛乡新旗村异常热闹。这个六盘山脚下的小村庄里的六盘山娅豪国际滑雪度假区再次迎来八方游客，滑雪爱好者们从雪道上翩然而下，在白色雪道留下优美弧线。
开幕式现场。 屈琳昆 摄当天，以“相约六盘山，健康冰雪行”为主题的宁夏固原·泾源第三届冰雪文化体育旅游节在六盘山娅豪国际滑雪度假区开幕。此次冬季冰雪赛事系列活动包括第九届全国大众冰雪季宁夏冰雪运动系列活动暨泾源县大众竞速滑雪公开赛、泾源县职工群众冰雪运动会、陕甘宁越野滑雪邀请赛(六盘山站)和宁夏青少年锦标赛—滑雪项目比赛(区级赛事)，各类活动与赛事让更多人参与和体验体验滑雪的激情酷爽。
冰天雪地里，滑雪爱好者络绎不绝。 屈琳昆 摄作为目前陕甘宁三省地区最大的综合性滑雪场，娅豪国际滑雪度假区一期开发已建成符合国际雪联规划标准设计的初、中、高级滑雪道9条和S形网红雪圈道，并拥有冬令营培训宿舍和雪景房等多种住宿设施，建成了西北地区最大、设施配套最全，集多种功能于一体的滑雪度假区。
开幕式现场，滑雪场教练组成员为游客们带来了一场精彩的滑雪表演。教练们身着中国古典服装，脚踏滑雪板，从雪道上翩然而下，衣摆迎风而起。
等待比赛的滑雪运动员。 屈琳昆 摄与此同时，活动现场特色旅游产品及非遗美食展示区也吸引了游客的驻足。“我把刺绣和朵绣作品带到了现场，也通过直播让更多人看到非遗。”马发勤是固原市刺绣传承人，冰雪文化体育旅游节的“非遗过大年”的活动让她的作品获得了更多关注。
作用宁夏的“后花园”，泾源县近年来将文化旅游作为全县产业发展的龙头牵引，激发其融合、催化、赋能作用，围绕整合旅游资源、发展民宿经济、设计精品路线、开发文创产品、提升服务品质“五项重点”，全力打造春季赏花、夏季避暑、秋季观景、冬季滑雪的全域旅游新格局。2022年，泾源县接待游客94万人次，社会综合收入近8亿元。
小组赛年龄最小的运动员进行比赛。 屈琳昆 摄开幕式后，泾源县竞速滑雪公开赛拉开帷幕。当天参加分组小组赛的选手中，年龄最大的选手为36岁，年龄最小的选手仅有9岁。滑雪作为一项全民性运动的热力，正在这片冰雪天地间缓缓流动。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
)